Required and optional checks
A verifier returns a list of checks, each either required or optional.A verifier that returns no required checks throws. A task cannot be graded on corroborating evidence alone, so an environment cannot accidentally ship a verifier that can never fail.
A failing run can still score well
This surprises people, and it is the point:0.60. But two required checks failed, so the task failed. The reward says “this agent was partly on track”; the result says “it did not do the job.”
Use passed for gating and reward for comparing. An agent that improves from 0.20 to 0.60 while still failing is making real progress, and a pass-rate-only view is blind to it.
Reading a result
result.json
failedRequired lists the labels that failed, which is usually all you need to know what went wrong. detail carries the numbers behind each verdict — a well-written verifier makes answered 507499, expected 507500 obvious at a glance.
Comparing across rollouts
Best 1.00 / Worst 0.20 describes an agent that can solve the task but does not reliably — a different problem from one that consistently scores 0.60 and never passes. The first needs reliability work, the second needs capability work.
What not to score
Do not grade which tools were called, or in what order, unless the process itself is what the task asks for. There are usually several reasonable routes to the same outcome, and scoring the route measures conformity rather than competence.toolCalls and toolErrors are recorded because they are useful diagnostics — an agent that took 40 calls to do a 3-call job is worth looking at — but they do not affect the score.
Silo